RADEKA Internal Production Control
A unified procedure for verifying design decisions, materials, processes, concealed stages and the finished result on RADEKA sites.
One control system — an individual plan for every site.
A single chain of responsibility
A complex project needs one system of responsibility
A beautiful result is never made of separate promises. It depends on how well design decisions, materials, substrate preparation, sequence of works, the actions of installers and the acceptance procedure are aligned with each other.
Requirements · materials · process · acceptance
That is why quality at RADEKA is treated as a system. Requirements and responsible people are defined before work begins. A dedicated quality plan is drawn up for every site: it lists critical operations, stop points, verification methods and the documents that confirm the result.
This matters most on complex projects, where a single unapproved substitution or an unnoticed deviation can affect several subsequent stages.
What changes for the client
Quality becomes a sequence of clear decisions — not something checked only at the very end.
Installers work to approved decisions, details, samples, technical requirements and the terms of the contract.
If the result becomes inaccessible once work continues, the stage is inspected before it is closed.
Replacing a material, detail, technique, color or sequence requires approval and a written record.
A completed stage passes internal engineering acceptance and a re-inspection after any remarks are resolved.
We check more than what is visible
Select a control point on the illustrative image of a complex site.
Illustrative visualization
Quality control is a chance to catch a mistake before it becomes part of the finished project.
How the system works
Verification begins before the site visit and continues through internal acceptance.
Control adapts to the type of work
The approach is uniform, but the content of the site quality plan depends on the project, materials and technique.
The list is given as an example. Specific requirements, control points and verification methods are defined by the project, the contract, the materials used and the site quality plan.
Universal control path for a site
Select a stage to see what is checked, who is involved, and how the result is recorded.
Stop point
If there is a risk of defect, the next stage does not begin
A worker, project manager or engineer who identifies a risk of defect must not allow it to carry through to the next operation.
Work on the affected area is stopped. The nonconformity is recorded, its impact is assessed, a decision is made, and once corrected, a re-inspection is carried out.
- 01Detection
- 02Recording
- 03Decision
- 04Correction
- 05Re-inspection
- 06Continuation
Result for the client
One accountable chain inside the company
- A clear sequence of works
- Requirements defined before critical operations
- Inspection of incoming materials
- Control of concealed and critical stages
- Remarks resolved before continuing
- Internal engineering acceptance
- Acts and as-built documents, as provided for by the contract and the site
Confidentiality. The recording format is defined by the type of work, the contract, the site quality plan and client requirements. We do not photograph the site if the client asks us not to.
System documents
The system is fixed by internal procedure
The documents define planning, verification, documentation, internal engineering acceptance and handling nonconformities.
The system is coordinated by the chief engineer
Mikhail Viktorovich Chernyshov
Chief Engineer, RADEKA
Coordinator of the internal production quality control system
Mikhail is involved in every RADEKA project: he works with project managers, engages with installers and technical questions, reviews critical decisions, and has the authority to reject a stage, require a remark to be resolved, or stop an operation until it is re-inspected.
Confirmed qualification
Project Chief Engineer
(construction management specialist)
Qualification level 7
Professional path
Production experience, metal roofing technology, leading a technical department and working as chief engineer.
Prevention instead of rework
What risks the control helps prevent
- 01Unsuitable, damaged or unidentified material
- 02Starting work on an unprepared substrate
- 03Closing an uninspected structure
- 04Deviation from the approved detail
- 05Violation of the operation sequence
- 06Unapproved substitution of material, color or technique
- 07Handing over a stage with unresolved remarks
Questions and answers
About RADEKAinternalcontrol
Briefly about the quality plan, stopping work, documents and participants in the control.